Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question?

Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question? Topic: Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question?
July 20, 2019 / By Chita
Question: Hello, This is a philosophy question: In the rules of implication, there is one rule which is addition. The formula is: p/p v q There is a problem that has just the letter H (which I am guessing is P) and they are asking for the conclusion using the addition formula above. Can someone explain how to use addition? Thank you
Best Answer

Best Answers: Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question?

Aston Aston | 1 day ago
I am presently studying mathematical logic, and I would love to help you out. Unfortunately, your question is too vague - you need to provide more detail, because every logic instructor and everything logic text does things a bit differently. There is a great online resource for philosophy students/mathematics students studying logic. Open Google and search for "philosophy forums". The first result is the one you want. Go to the "Logic and Philosophy of Math" section, and then go to the "Logic Homework" section. There you can post your logic homework question and receive help from other philosophy students and instructors, logicians, and mathematicians, or whoever. Note that you will have to make an account with Philosophy Forums to post questions. Signing up for an account is free. But the biggest suggestion I can give is to state your question very clearly, and with adequate information for someone to help you. Like I said, the way your question is posed here it is very difficult for me to understand what it is you're asking.
👍 130 | 👎 1
Did you like the answer? Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question? Share with your friends
Aston Originally Answered: Philosophy Essay Question-I have never taken Philosophy! : (?
Start by getting an idea about Plato's Theory of Forms. Every object has it's real existence in the realm of forms. What we see are but imperfect variations on the Form. This can be anything. geometric shape, star, number, type of yoghurt... The supreme form is the Form of the Good. Philosophers progress in wisdom until they apprehend the forms. As someone tried to say but spelt it wrong, compared to this Ari is probably a lot less mystical (because though he uses many serious philosophical arguments when establishing the Forms, it is basically turns out to be quite a mystical idea (Phaedo) and more "empirical". (But there will be more to it than that. He was Plato's pupil, but he wasn't a Platonist. He a different style and different aims as a philosopher, a different notion of what philosophy was really. See section 3 of http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wisdom... for Aristotle's notion of wisdom for example. So read about Plato's theory of Forms and get a grasp of that (avoid Wikipedia - there is so much good stuff about it which will be more reliable). Philosopher means "lover of wisdom" and for Plato a Wise person, a philosopher is someone who has been trained to apprehend the Forms. Use your intuition combined with critical, logical, thinking. be confident.
Aston Originally Answered: Philosophy Essay Question-I have never taken Philosophy! : (?
I say you start by reading Plato and Aristotle. I did that once, years ago. Any information gleaned from it is long gone.

Abagael Abagael
Hello small, sure it's real that there's a near dating among arithmetic and philosophy. Philosophy the very phrase is derived correct from philo and sophy. They imply love and knowledge. So philosophy is love closer to knowledge. Mathematics is the foundation which has given the orderliness for nature to come back out within the correct designed manner. So systematic pondering might have mathematical common sense and so inter dating among the 2. Zero itself is philosophical one. Actually 0 was once first introduced into the scene by means of Indian philosophers. Zero itself is a relative one and it's not present certainly. Sometimes we are saying that the entire construction has pop out of nothingness. But real it's not so. There isn't any such nothingness state. It is handiest the silence of the ever present cognizance. Becoming aware is identical to fitting lively. So cognizance is for ever. That is past time. As 0 is to be regarded as relative consequently infinity too is to be a relative one. So one exists for ever. That is not anything however cognizance. Pure cognizance!
👍 50 | 👎 -6

Sonny Sonny
From H you can deduce H v (...) for anything at all inside the parentheses. So you can deduce H v J if you want. Or H v A. Or H v (J --> ~A) if you want. If there's something you're trying to deduce, then that will change how you want to use addition.
👍 50 | 👎 -13

Sonny Originally Answered: What is moral implication? PLEASE help me out?
The moral implications are the thoughts and actions of the character that result from his opinion that his society is unjust. Did he oppose that society openly? Did he pursue political or community correction? Did he leave it because it was unjust? Did he become a "robin hood", opposing the society subversively, or perhaps a Ghandi, with peaceful opposition. Was he willing to commit treason due to his moral position? Or did he surrender his personal morals because the unjust society won? Hope this helps. Good luck.

If you have your own answer to the question Rules of implication - Philosophy Math Question?, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.