5706 Shares

2 state solution and Israeli arabs?

2 state solution and Israeli arabs? Topic: 2 state solution and Israeli arabs?
June 20, 2019 / By Colena
Question: In a 2 state solution where would Israeli arabs prefer to live? In Israel as second class citizens or in Palestine? All of Palestine? Including the west where the majority was made up of Jews? "They are not given the same rights as Jews." This is true. Can you name those specific rights? Michelle can you provide a specific right. I agree with you but I just want to know which specific right or rights you are talking about.........also what is a Palestinian Jew?
Best Answer

Best Answers: 2 state solution and Israeli arabs?

Benedicta Benedicta | 10 days ago
To answer you, Israeli Arabs are very happy living in Israel and would not move anywhere else.Yes, they are given the same rights as other citizens (Jewish , christians druze, have all equal rights) Israel is one of the most open societies in the world. Out of a population of 6.7 million, about 1.3 million — 20 percent of the population — are non-Jews (approximately 1.1 million Muslims, 130,000 Christians and 100,000 Druze).1 Arabs in Israel have equal voting rights; in fact, it is one of the few places in the Middle East where Arab women may vote. Arabs currently hold 8 seats in the 120-seat Knesset. Israeli Arabs have also held various government posts, including one who served as Israel's ambassador to Finland and the current deputy mayor of Tel Aviv. Oscar Abu Razaq was appointed Director General of the Ministry of Interior, the first Arab citizen to become chief executive of a key government ministry. Ariel Sharon's original cabinet included the first Arab minister, Salah Tarif, a Druze who served as a minister without portfolio. An Arab is also a Supreme Court justice. Arabic, like Hebrew, is an official language in Israel. More than 300,000 Arab children attend Israeli schools. At the time of Israel's founding, there was one Arab high school in the country. Today, there are hundreds of Arab schools.2 In 2002, the Israeli Supreme Court also ruled that the government cannot allocate land based on religion or ethnicity, and may not prevent Arab citizens from living wherever they choose.2a The sole legal distinction between Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel is that the latter are not required to serve in the Israeli army. This is to spare Arab citizens the need to take up arms against their brethren. Nevertheless, Bedouins have served in paratroop units and other Arabs have volunteered for military duty. Compulsory military service is applied to the Druze and Circassian communities at their own request. Some economic and social gaps between Israeli Jews and Arabs result from the latter not serving in the military. Veterans qualify for many benefits not available to non-veterans. Moreover, the army aids in the socialization process. On the other hand, Arabs do have an advantage in obtaining some jobs during the years Israelis are in the military. In addition, industries like construction and trucking have come to be dominated by Israeli Arabs. Although Israeli Arabs have occasionally been involved in terrorist activities, they have generally behaved as loyal citizens. During the 1967, 1973 and 1982 wars, none engaged in any acts of sabotage or disloyalty. Sometimes, in fact, Arabs volunteered to take over civilian functions for reservists. During the outbreak of violence in the territories that began in September 2000, Israeli Arabs for the first time engaged in widespread protests with some violence. The United States has been independent for almost 230 years and still has not integrated all of its diverse communities. Even today, 60 years after civil rights legislation was adopted, discrimination has not been eradicated. It should not be surprising that Israel has not solved all of its social problems in only 60 years.
👍 268 | 👎 10
Did you like the answer? 2 state solution and Israeli arabs? Share with your friends
Benedicta Originally Answered: Are arabs terrorists or is it the state of israel?
The reason for the conflict between Israel and the Arabs is that the Arabs, plain and simple, refuse to accept a Jewish state in their midst. They invented this whole idea of a "Palestinian people who deserve a state" just to use as a tool to dismember Israel. Prior to partition, Palestinian Arabs did not view themselves as having a separate identity. When the First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations met in Jerusalem in February 1919 to choose Palestinian representatives for the Paris Peace Conference, the following resolution was adopted: "We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds. "There is no such country as Palestine! 'Palestine' is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria." - Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, a local Arab leader, to the Peel Commission, 1937 The reason for the conflict between Israel and the Arabs is that the Arabs, plain and simple, refuse to accept a Jewish state in their midst. They invented this whole idea of a "Palestinian people who deserve a state" just to use as a tool to dismember Israel. Arab violence against Jews has been going on long before there was an occupation, long before there was a refugee problem--indeed, long before there was a political Zionist movement. Need I present more painful examples? Perhaps even further back, where I hope everyone will agree that the Zionist movement did not yet come into being: In the centuries after Muhammad there have been periods when the Jews were able to live in relative peace under Arabs, but their position was never secure. They were generally viewed with contempt by their Arab neighbors, and their survival was always predicated on their abject subordination and degradation to them. Mass murders of Jewish "protected people" started in Morocco as early as the eighth century, where Idris I wiped out whole communities. A century later Baghdad's Caliph al-Mutawakkil designated a yellow badge for Jews (setting a precedent that would be followed centuries later in Nazi Germany), and synagogues were destroyed throughout Mesopotamia in 854-859. In Tripolitania, Jews were considered the property of their Arab masters, who would bequeath the Jews to their heirs upon death. In the 12th century, after anti-Jewish riots, the contemporaries commented that their population had 'greatly declined.' ( Middle East Digest, September 1999) As to how to solve the problem, the only way would be for Israel to have an overwhelming defeat of the Arabs and then dictate the terms for peace. Otherwise, the Arabs will never stop trying to destroy Israel.

Adrianna Adrianna
Israeli-Arab people are citizens of the State of Israel and as such would have a choice of either staying within Israel or moving to a future Palestinian State. The historical precedent for that was the 1947 partition of the Indian subcontinent between India and Pakistan.
👍 110 | 👎 3

Thad Thad
Although at last count 60% of Israeli Arabs consider themselves "Palestinians", I believe that they would still prefer to live in Israel rather than to face the unknown in a future Palestine.
👍 101 | 👎 -4

Pompey Pompey
I would hope those who consider themselves Palestinian would relocate not only for Israels sake but for the Pals themselves, these Israeli Arabs would be a moderating element in the Political makeup of any future 2nd Palestinian state.
👍 92 | 👎 -11

Mahon Mahon
I think they'd prefer equal status within Israel. A future Palestine hasn't even been created yet, it is still in the works, and it will continue like this as long as there is no peace process, a continuation of settlements and an ongoing occupation. Discrimination: home demolitions of Arab and Sephardic Jewish homes, wage and income disparity between Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews, documentation of Sephardic Jews living in refugee camps with tents on mud in the late fifties while others lived in houses and apartments, kicking out of people from their apartment buildings, high rate of homelessness, poverty, unemployment and lack of transportation for Israeli Arabs, unfair land distribution, unfair zoning laws, lack of representation in government, limitations on political participation by Israeli Arab parties under false pretences by Supreme Court due to false accusations of support for terrorism, on and on...
👍 83 | 👎 -18

Jemmy Jemmy
i dont realize why humans fake to not realize how the arena works. to start with, not anything is occurring due to the fact one or the opposite or either side at any given time thinks that they may be able to do higher through ready than through creating a deal instantly. in 1948 the arab aspect rejected any deal, pondering they might do away with the jewish state altogether, but when they'd made a deal then, they might have now not best the entire 1967-occupied lands but in addition so much of what's now israel, plus there might were no tragedy of refugees, plus israel itself might have a far better arab populace than it does now. in 1967 the israelis might have had practically any deal they desired, however they'd a few insane notion of protecting directly to the entire occupied territories plus sinai and golan and perhaps even increasing extra one day (with out giving the arab population citizenship or the vote), and the entire tragedies due to the fact 1967 might were have shyed away from. at quite a lot of instances due to the fact then the equal sort of hindrance has repeated itself, whilst one aspect used to be able to deal however the different now not. at gift obviously many arabs believe that in the event that they wait lengthy adequate, there'll both be a conflict of a few form that israel loses extra decisively than it lose in lebanon and/or the arab populace of israel itself and esp. the occupied territories will develop very enormously in comparison to the jewish populace. what the humans liable at the israeli aspect are pondering is much less transparent, however possibly one notion at the back of a few of their minds is that, in a few form of a rather terrible long term clash, they're going to control to create plenty extra refugees and/or perhaps that palestinians will ultimately get bored stiff and begin emigrating in giant numbers and/or perhaps that they are going to get bored stiff in yet another manner and make a rather dangerous deal. moment, aside from hoping rationally for a higher deal, there's the component of humans suspending the inevitable hoping maybe that it's going to occur after they're lifeless. it sort of feels that arafat might without problems now not convey himself to make a last manage the israelis and desired it to occur on any one else's watch. it's possibly that one of the crucial israeli leaders at quite a lot of instances have felt the equal. so well-nigh, the notion is to count on that matters is not going to get so much worse than they're now if we wait, so why make a deal and danger being disgraced perpetually within the historical past of books as a "traitor" in your humans? allow any one else take the danger when we're long gone.
👍 74 | 👎 -25

Gene Gene
I think Israeli Arabs would still prefer to live in Israel because the Israeli government is very fair and their children will have a much brighter future.
👍 65 | 👎 -32

Digory Digory
I say Palestinians are considered second class citizens. They are not given the same rights as Jews. Edit: Palestinians Muslims are not given the same rights as Palestinian Jews and immigrated Jews.
👍 56 | 👎 -39

Blake Blake
I am not Palestinian but I would think Palestine. Honestly Palestinians deserve all of Palestine back but that's not going to happen.
👍 47 | 👎 -46

Blake Originally Answered: Which is the better solution to solving a state's debt?
Well, while I think that the slant of this question is too far (you're basically giving us only one option, since the second option has explanation under it of why it is good), I do agree with your general solution. The big problem with reducing worker wages is that when worker wages go down, their spending in the economy also decreases. The most surefire way to revitalize an economy is to have people engaging in the consumer culture, spending their dollars in the market and letting those dollars cycle through. I don't agree that the rich never create jobs, they do, the problem is that tax decreases or increases tend to have little effect on the amount of jobs when those taxes are on them. There's little empirical evidence that shows a correlation between the two, and the main reason for that is because, when rich people in a down economy get extra money, they put it away for a rainy day. There tends to be little investment in expansion of a company when the economy isn't doing well.

If you have your own answer to the question 2 state solution and Israeli arabs?, then you can write your own version, using the form below for an extended answer.